What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a cell tower look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create issues for users.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
But, click here found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to http://kidneymosque5.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/34057701-what-lengths-can-you-get-from-your-5g-mobile-phone-tower-without-staying-unsafe?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog , ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.